Jens Koehrsen (Köhrsen) is a professor for religion and economics at the Centre for Religion, Economy and Politics (ZRWP). He has studied sociology, philosophy and evangelical theology (Mag.), social sciences (Dipl.) and economics (Dipl.) at the Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, University of Salamanca and the University of Buenos Aires.
Fascinated by the relationship between social inequality and religion, Jens Koehrsen conducted his PhD research on the religious tastes and styles of middle-class Pentecostals in Argentina. In 2013, he received his PhD in sociology from the University of Bielefeld and the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS)
Towards the end of his PhD, he started to work in the area of sociology of innovation at the Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, conducting a collaborative research project on local energy transition processes in Germany and France. In 2016, his research interest in the societal transformations towards sustainability drove him to the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford where he was an honorary research associate until 2018.
In the winter term 2017/18, he was a guest professor for sociology at the University of Münster. Currently, Jens Koehrsen is undertaking sociological research about climate change and the relationship between religion and sustainable development. He is supervising the SNF-project “Urban Green Religions”.
Religion and Sustainable Development, Low Carbon Transitions, Social Differentiation, Sociological Theory, Qualitative Research Methods.
SNSF-project: Urban Green Religions? Religion in Low Carbon Transitions in two Western European Cities
EUCOR-project: Synergies from an Integrated Renewable Energy Supply and Storage System in the Upper Rhine Region: An Interdisciplinary Analysis (SIRES_URR)
Koehrsen, Jens (2018) Urban Energy Transitions: Why It Is Challenging To Govern Them And How They Govern Themselves, in: sciencetrends.com, https://sciencetrends.com/urban-energy-transitions-why-it-is-challenging-to-govern-them-and-how-they-govern-themselves/
Koehrsen, Jens (2018) “Religion und soziale Ungleichheit”, in: Pollack, Detlef; Krech, Volkhard; Müller, Olaf; Hero, Markus (ed.): Handbuch Religionssoziologie. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, p. 863-883, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-531-18924-6_35
Koehrsen, Jens (2018) “Exogenous shocks, social skill, and power: Urban energy transitions as social fields“, in: Energy Policy 117, p. 307–315; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.035.
Koehrsen, Jens (2018) “Religious Tastes and Styles as Markers of Class Belonging: A Bourdieuian Perspective on Pentecostalism in South America”, in: Sociology; Online first: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517722288
Koehrsen, Jens (2018) “Religious Agency in Sustainability Transitions: Between Experimentation, Upscaling, and Regime Support“, in: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. Online first: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.09.003
Koehrsen, Jens (2017) “When Sects become Middle Class: Impression Management among Middle Class Pentecostals in Argentina”, in: Sociology of Religion 78 (3), p. 318–339; https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srx030.
Koehrsen, Jens (2017) “Boundary Bridging Arrangements: A Boundary Work Approach to Local Energy Transitions.”, in: Sustainability 9 (424). www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/424/pdf
Koehrsen, Jens (2016) Middle Class Pentecostalism in Argentina: Inappropriate Spirits. Leiden/Boston: Brill. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/books/9789004310148
Koehrsen, Jens (2015) “Does Religion Promote Environmental Sustainability? – Exploring the Role of Religion in Local Energy Transitions”, in: Social Compass 62 (3), p. 296-310; doi.org/10.1177/0037768615587808
Mattes, Jannika; Huber, Andreas; Koehrsen, Jens (2015) “Energy transitions in small-scale regions – what we can learn from a regional innovation systems perspective”; in: Energy Policy 78, p. 255-264; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.011
Koehrsen, Jens (2012) „How religious is the public sphere? – A critical stance on the debate about public religion and post-secularity.”, Acta Sociologica 55 (3), p. 273-288; https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699312445809